How should doctors be paid?

Most doctors are paid by some version of how they have always been paid–what is loosely called “fee for service.” The notion is simple: the doctor gets paid for each encounter with a patient, whether this is an office visit or a major surgical operation. Thus the more the doctor does, the more he gets paid. It seems fair. After all, shouldn’t we get paid for the work we do?

The fee-for-service model, however, has long had critics. The most fundamental objection is that it rewards doctors for doing things. In an environment like that, one in which the more one does the more he gets paid, the doctor is tempted to do things that don’t need to be done, or choose the thing to do for which he gets paid more rather than the thing that pays less. In the ideal situation, of course, the doctor won’t consider those things–rather, he will put the patient’s best interests first. But doctors are human, and fee-for-service presents a doctor with a fundamental conflict of interest.

The alternative to fee-for-service is some sort of payment system in which the doctor is paid a salary that is the same no matter how much he does. This is currently done by some large practices, including the Mayo Clinic. Critics of this salaried system believe that, without financial incentives, doctors will simply not work as hard. Other physician groups blend together the two approaches, with a salary supplemented by some sort of bonus for doctors who do more.

The debate is more than a financial one–it is also a philosophical one. Most free market enthusiasts strongly support fee-for-service; those who favor tighter regulation of medical care, often including one of various single-payer models, are typically open to salary-based payment models. Salary-model systems also are frequently used by Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) systems.

Historically, organized medicine has been strongly opposed to paying physicians by any other method than fee-for-service. Seventy-five years ago, physicians who accepted salaried arrangements were ostracized by their peers and sometimes even penalized. This view has changed to some extent, but I think it is still fair to say that most American physicians favor traditional fee-for-service.

For myself, I favor a salary model (or salary plus a modest incentive for extra productivity) for what I do. I work in the field of intensive care, which lends itself well to this. Other specialties are somewhat different. My job, in effect, is to be like a firefighter waiting in the firehouse–if the PICU is busy, I work harder; if there are less patients, I can ease up. After all, we pay firefighters whether or not they are fighting a fire.

I see no reason why physician payment strategies must be all one thing or all another. It seems to me that whatever evolves from our current chaotic situation could find a place for both approaches. Hard work should be rewarded. However, and this is a big however, we need to understand the inherent conflict of interest of traditional fee-for-service medicine. Also, not all rewards for hard work need be financial ones.


Comments

One response to “How should doctors be paid?”

  1. Hello Chris,

    Our medical system is broken and must be fixed. I wish I had an easy answer to the difficulties that you and other doctors are facing. There don’t seem to be easy answers.

    I followed Hillary Clinton’s attempts to put together a health care plan. How do these compare to Obama’s purported ideas? Do you and other doctors fully understand what needs to be done? The “single payer” system seems to have problems, too. With the economic sinkhole, it remains to be seen how high on the new president’s “TO-DO” list it will be placed.

    For your information, I had to pay $500 a month premiums for THREE YEARS between ages 62 and 65 — prior to qualifying for Medicare. This was because my husband’s employer went bankrupt and they were self insured. There was NO COBRA… and NO PRIVATE insurance company would take me on. This appeared to be because of pre-existing conditions like hypothyroidism and other minor complaints. Luckily, I qualified for OMIP (the Oregon Medical Insurance Pool) and now have coverage with an HMO here in Oregon.

    There have been serious errors in their care. I am just one of hundreds (thousands?) of my primary care physician’s patients. This all comes after having one internist take care of me and my husband in Massachusetts for 27 years with a sub-set of specialists. After my daughter was born in October 1968, I still have the cancelled check for the pediatrician. I paid $15.00 each for “fee for service” office visit and her first vaccinations.

    I will be 70 years old in 2009. Most of the time, I don’t wish for the “olden days” — but in medicine, I’m have to say that it seemed better then than it is now.

    EK

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *